Another Look at the Obama and Netanyahu Speeches Given In May
Back then, I published a parsing of the speeches given by the President and the Prime Minister. I believe it is worth republishing this comparison since some may have missed it because the topic may not have been clear from the title. Back then, I was upset at how both the MSM (main stream media) and Congress dealt with both the visit in general and more specifically, the speeches that were given. A close analysis of all four speeches shows that they both used virtually the same language in dealing with the topics, yet one would never know it from reading the press accounts or the sound bites of those in the Congress on both sides of the aisle. Additionally, it is worth viewing for yourself the press conference after Obama and Netanyahu’s meeting because you first need to hear what the President said and then listen to Bibi’s response. My take on it was that rather than Bibi “lecturing” Obama, Bibi simply went off into a soliloquy in which he presented his point of view, but wasn’t really addressing the President. It would have been nice if at least one journalist had expressed this take on the interchange – but I have yet to see one.
As for Netanyahu’s speeches, one would certainly have expected a warm welcome from the AIPAC attendees, but the love fest in Congress was over the top. Interestingly, on a recent conference call, I heard one Congresswoman characterize the speech as “masterfully written” because just reading the text clearly showed all of the applause points. As she said: “Who isn’t going to stand up for ‘mom and apple pie'”.
What follows is a topic by topic comparison of the language of the four speeches given in the five days surrounding the Israeli Prime Minister’s trip. These are all direct quotes.
1. Obama at the State Department, May 19
2. Obama at AIPAC, May 22
3. Netanyahu at AIPAC, May 23
4. Netanyahu before Congress, May 24
TOPIC |
OBAMA-STATE DEPT |
OBAMA-AIPAC |
NETANYAHU-AIPAC |
NETANYAHU-CONGRESS |
|
|
|
|
|
Borders |
The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states. |
The borders of Israel and Palestine should be based on the 1967 lines with mutually agreed swaps, so that secure and recognized borders are established for both states. |
|
|
Borders The Sequel |
|
By definition, it means that the parties themselves – Israelis and Palestinians – will negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967. It is a well known formula to all who have worked on this issue for a generation |
|
The status of the settlements will be decided only in negotiations. But wemust also be honest. So I am saying today something that should be saidpublicly by anyone serious about peace. In any peace agreement that endsthe conflict, some settlements will end up beyond Israel’s borders. Theprecise delineation of those borders must be negotiated. |
Borders III |
|
It allows the parties themselves to account for the changes that have taken place over the last forty-four years, including the new demographic realities on the ground and the needs of both sides. |
|
This compromise must reflect the dramatic demographic changes that have occurred since 1967. |
Enough with the Borders Already |
|
|
|
We will be very generous on the size of a future Palestinian state. But as President Obama said, the border will be different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967. Israel will not return to the indefensible lines of 1967. |
Palestinian Right of Return |
Open issue |
|
|
Palestinians from around the world should have a right to immigrate, if theyso choose, to a Palestinian state. This means that the Palestinian refugeeproblem will be resolved outside the borders of Israel. |
Jerusalem |
Open issue |
|
|
As for Jerusalem, only a democratic Israel has protected freedom of worshipfor all faiths in the city. Jerusalem must never again be divided.Jerusalem must remain the united capital of Israel. I know that this is adifficult issue for Palestinians. But I believe with creativity and goodwilla solution can be found. |
Israel as a Jewish State |
|
Israel as a Jewish state and the homeland for the Jewish people, and the state of Palestine as the homeland for the Palestinian people; each state enjoying self-determination, mutual recognition, and peace. [Emphasis added] |
|
My friends, this must come to an end. President Abbas must do what I havedone. I stood before my people, and I told you it wasn’t easy for me, and Isaid… “I will accept a Palestinian state.” It is time for President Abbas tostand before his people and say… “I will accept a Jewish state.” |
Self-Defense |
As for security, every state has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to defend itself — by itself — against any threat |
As for security, every state has the right to self-defense, and Israel must be able to defend itself – by itself – against any threat. |
|
When we say never again, we mean never again. Israel always reserves the right to defend itself. |
Security |
Provisions must also be robust enough to prevent a resurgence of terrorism; to stop the infiltration of weapons; and to provide effective border security. The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state. The duration of this transition period must be agreed, and the effectiveness of security arrangements must be demonstrated.[Emphasis added] |
Provisions must also be robust enough to prevent a resurgence of terrorism; to stop the infiltration of weapons; and to provide effective border security. The full and phased withdrawal of Israeli military forces should be coordinated with the assumption of Palestinian security responsibility in a sovereign, non-militarized state. The duration of this transition period must be agreed, and the effectiveness of security arrangements must be demonstrated. |
|
So it is therefore absolutely vital for Israel’s security that a Palestinian state be fully demilitarized. And it is vital that Israel maintain a long-term military presence along the Jordan River. Solid security arrangements on the ground are necessary not only to protect the peace, they are necessary to protect Israel in case the peace unravels. For in our unstable region, no one can guarantee that our peace partners today will be there tomorrow. |
Obama Admin Commitment to Israel |
As for Israel, our friendship is rooted deeply in a shared history and shared values. Our commitment to Israel’s security is unshakeable. And we will stand against attempts to single it out for criticism in international forums. But precisely because of our friendship, it is important that we tell the truth: the status quo is unsustainable, and Israel too must act boldly to advance a lasting peace. |
|
Yesterday President Obama spoke about his ironclad commitment to Israel’ssecurity. He rightly said that our security cooperation is unprecedented. Hespoke of that commitment in front of AIPAC. He spoke about it in twospeeches heard throughout the Arab world. And he has backed those wordswith deeds. |
|
Security Cooperation |
|
It’s why we’ve increased cooperation between our militaries to unprecedented levels. |
He rightly said that our security cooperation is unprecedented |
|
Advanced Technologies |
|
It’s why we’re making our most advanced technologies available to our Israeli allies |
|
|
Military $$ |
|
And it’s why, despite tough fiscal times, we’ve increased foreign military financing to record levels. |
I know these are tough economic times. So I want to thank the president andCongress for providing Israel with vital assistance so that Israel candefend itself by itself |
Thank you all, and thank you President Obama,for your steadfast commitment to Israel’s security. I know economic timesare tough. I deeply appreciate this. |
Iron Dome |
|
That includes additional support – beyond regular military aid – for the Iron Dome anti-rocket system. This is a powerful example of American-Israel cooperation which has already intercepted rockets from Gaza and helped saved innocent Israeli lives. … make no mistake, we will maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge. |
I want to thank you all for supporting the IronDome missile defense system |
|
Agreement Must Be Between the Two Parties |
|
These are the facts. I firmly believe, and repeated on Thursday, that peace cannot be imposed on the parties to the conflict. |
|
|
Delegitimization |
For the Palestinians, efforts to delegitimize Israel will end in failure. Symbolic actions to isolate Israel at the United Nations in September won’t create an independent state. |
You also see our commitment to Israel’s security in our steadfast opposition to any attempt to de-legitimize the State of Israel. As I said at the United Nation’s last year, “Israel’s existence must not be a subject for debate,” and “efforts to chip away at Israel’s legitimacy will only be met by the unshakeable opposition of the United States.”…No vote at the United Nations will ever create an independent Palestinian state. And the United States will stand up against efforts to single Israel out at the UN or in any international forum. Because Israel’s legitimacy is not a matter for debate. |
|
|
Hamas As a Partner |
Palestinian leaders will not achieve peace or prosperity if Hamas insists on a path of terror and rejection. |
Moreover, we know that peace demands a partner – which is why I said that Israel cannot be expected to negotiate with Palestinians who do not recognize its right to exist, and we will hold the Palestinians accountable for their actions and their rhetoric. |
|
And Hamas is not a partner for peace. Hamas remains committed to Israel’sdestruction and to terrorism. They have a charter. That charter not onlycalls for the obliteration of Israel, but says ‘kill the Jews wherever youfind them’. Hamas’ leader condemned the killing of Osama bin Laden andpraised him as a holy warrior. |
Hamas-Fatah Unification |
the recent announcement of an agreement between Fatah and Hamas raises profound and legitimate questions for Israel — how can one negotiate with a party that has shown itself unwilling to recognize your right to exist. In the weeks and months to come, Palestinian leaders will have to provide a credible answer to that question. |
And I indicated on Thursday that the recent agreement between Fatah and Hamas poses an enormous obstacle to peace. No country can be expected to negotiate with a terrorist organization sworn to its destruction. We will continue to demand that Hamas accept the basic responsibilities of peace: recognizing Israel’s right to exist, rejecting violence, and adhering to all existing agreements |
|
|
Israel’s Right to Exist |
And Palestinians will never realize their independence by denying the right of Israel to exist. |
|
|
My friends, this must come to an end. President Abbas must do what I havedone. I stood before my people, and I told you it wasn’t easy for me, and Isaid… “I will accept a Palestinian state.” It is time for President Abbas tostand before his people and say… “I will accept a Jewish state.” |
Gilad Shalit |
|
And we once again call on Hamas to release Gilad Shalit, who has been kept from his family for five long years. |
And you’ve joinedPresident Obama and me in denouncing Hamas and demanding that it release our captive soldier, Gilad Shalit |
|
New Proposals? |
|
There was nothing particularly original in my proposal; this basic framework for negotiations has long been the basis for discussions among the parties, including previous U.S. Administrations.…By definition, it means that the parties themselves – Israelis and Palestinians – will negotiate a border that is different than the one that existed on June 4, 1967. It is a well known formula to all who have worked on this issue for a generation …If there’s a controversy, then, it’s not based in substance. What I did on Thursday was to say publicly what has long been acknowledged privately. [Emphasis added] |
|
|
Palestinian intransigence |
|
|
|
So why has peace not beenachieved? Because so far, the Palestinians have been unwilling to accept a Palestinian state, if it meant accepting a Jewish state alongside it.…You see, our conflict has never been about the establishment of a Palestinian state. It has always been about the existence of the Jewish state. |
Iran |
|
See below |
|
A nuclear-armed Iran would ignite a nuclear arms race in the Middle East…This is why I ask you to continue to send an unequivocal message: That America will never permit Iran to develop nuclear weapons. |
Obama’s Actions Against Iran |
|
You also see our commitment to our shared security in our determination to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Here in the U.S., we’ve imposed the toughest sanctions ever on the Iranian regime. At the United Nations, we’ve secured the most comprehensive international sanctions on the regime, which have been joined by allies and partners around the world. Today, Iran is virtually cut off from large parts of the international financial system, and we are going to keep up the pressure. So let me be absolutely clear – we remain committed to preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. |
|
It is even worse because thereare many who rush to condemn Israel for defending itself against Iran’sterror proxies. But not you. Not America. You have acted differently. You’ve condemned the Iranian regime for its genocidal aims. You’ve passed tough sanctions against Iran. History will salute you America. President Obama has said that the United States is determined to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. He successfully led the Security Council to adopt sanctions against Iran. You in Congress passed even tougher sanctions. These words and deeds are vitally important. |
Arab Teaching Hatred |
For Israelis, it has meant living with the fear that their children could get blown up on a bus or by rockets fired at their homes, as well as the pain of knowing that other children in the region are taught to hate them. |
|
|
They continue to educate their children to hate. They continue to namepublic squares after terrorists. And worst of all, they continue toperpetuate the fantasy that Israel will one day be flooded by thedescendants of Palestinian refugees. |
Related articles
- Israel’s 1967 borders ‘indefensible’, Netanyahu tells Aipac (guardian.co.uk)
- “Former AIPAC Official Dodges Questions On Whether 1967 Borders Has Been US Policy For Years™” and related posts (wonkroom.thinkprogress.org)
– Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
Related articles
Recent Posts
- What You Can Do Now To Help Save This Country
- Today’s J Street Chicago Luncheon
- Former Mossad chief Meir Dagan speaks his mind to 25,000 at Tel Aviv rally
- Will #Bibi mention this in Congress? Khamenei agrees with Congress: No deal better than a bad deal http://t.co/P8yzZNXIAd via @AlMonitor
- Meetings Last Week with Members of the Knesset About the Current Situation in Israel and Operation Protective Edge